Attn:  Anybody Involved In a Child Custody Case in Allegheny County

"Did You Know 4 Out of 5 Allegheny Forensics Psychologists Have
Been Found
Guilty of
Ethical Violations...

...and Why This Matters To You and Your Children?

"I'll be the first to admit, we make some bad calls.
-Mark King,
Former Member of Allegheny Forensics



You Need To Read This If You...
  • Are Afraid You're Going to Lose Custody of Your Children...
  • Are You Involved In a Child Custody Case In Allegheny County...
  • Have You Already Gone Through a Court Appointed Custody Evaluation...
  • Have Been Treated Unfairly by the Court Appointed Psychologist...
  • Are Frustrated Because Your Lawyer Doesn't Seem To Be Aggressive Enough When Confronting the Psychologist...
  • Need Help With Your Custody Case And Aren't Sure Who Can Help You...

Dear Friend,

You're about to learn about one of the best kept secrets in Allegheny County -a private company called Allegheny Forensics Association.

Allegheny Forensics Association was set up at the urging of a few Family Court judges who wanted an outside company to perform all custody evaluations for Allegheny County.   The reasoning was that it would be better if all custody evaluations were performed uniformly by one pre-determined group of professional custody evaluators.  

However, in practice, this system fails miserably to look out for the best interest of the children. Here's why...


How the System Was Set Up to
NOT
Serve the Best Interests of Your Children


In or around 2002 or 2003, the Family Court of Allegheny County decided that it wanted to find a way to streamline, and make uniform, all child custody evaluations in Allegheny County.  Without naming names, a small group of judges helped coordinate the formation of a private company, named Allegheny Forensics Association Custody Division.  

Some lawyers, who wish to remain anonymous, stated directly that the judges didn't want to hear evidence themselves in court, and would rather have an outside private company become the "finder of fact" for the judges.  

Of course this was already the way things were done before Allegheny Forensics was formed. However, there was no systematic way to choose which psychologist the Court would choose to do a custody evaluation.  

The solution was to form Allegheny Forensics by having the most prominent, and politically connected, custody evaluators join together and enter into an exclusive contract with Allegheny County.

Some of the members associated with this group are Mark King, Neil Rosenblum, Patricia Pepe, Ronald Neeper, and William Fischer. 

Other child evaluators in Pittsburgh who weren't as well connected politically, or who dared question the ethics of this group, were NOT included.  Some very prominent custody evaluators even decided not to become part of this group because they objected to the way in which this group planned on doing custody evaluations.  

In short, a single company contracted to do every custody evaluation in Allegheny County would never be able to properly handle the number of cases and still perform thorough evaluations.  Plus, the number of conflicts of interest this created, and the number of ethical issues this setup raised are too numerous to mention here.

visit PittsburghDivorce.org

 

A Monopoly Created by Allegheny County

After months of negotiations and fine tuning of the contract, Allegheny County apparently entered into an exclusive contract with Allegheny Forensics. 

What this meant to people involved in custody cases in Allegheny County was that the evidence in their custody case would be presented to a psychologist from this group, who would act as a "finder of fact" for the judge.  The court appointed psychologist was responsible for evaluating the family situation, and for recommending to the judge which parent should get primary physical and legal custody.

However, as with any monopoly, the fact that Allegheny Forensics had no competition led quickly to an abuse of the system.  The psychologists were charged with handling a huge volume of custody cases.  For each case, Allegheny Forensics was paid nearly $5000.  Obviously, the more cases they had, the more money Allegheny Forensics would make.  

Obviously, there are only so many hours in a week.  The less time the custody evaluators spend on any one case, the more time they have to squeeze in other cases.  In other words, if an evaluator spent 20 hours a week on one case, he could make $10,000 a week.  If he spent only 10 hours per case, he could double his pay and make $20,000 a week.  

The less time evaluators spent on cases, the richer they could become.


Destined To Fail From The Start?


Because Allegheny Forensics has an exclusive contract with Allegheny County, the system was destined from the start to fail.  The sheer volume of cases that are assigned to Allegheny Forensics precludes the psychologists involved from properly discharging their duties in terms of the thoroughness of their evaluations.  

Even if the evaluators had the highest ethics, they wouldn't be able to discharge their duties properly.

However, there are two other factors that made this situation even worse.  

The psychologists realized that the less time they spent on an evaluation, the more money they would make.  Second, the psychologists knew that they had no competition, and nobody who would hold them accountable for their inept evaluations.  Because they had a monopoly over custody evaluations in Allegheny County, the evaluators could spend less time on each case and make more money.  

There's definitely something wrong when the system is set up so that a less competent job rewards the psychologists with more money.  

What makes this situation even worse is the fact that Allegheny Forensics is not made up entirely of custody evaluators with pristine ethical records who are above reproach.  In fact, it's just the opposite...



Staffed by Unethical Doctors?


Another lawyer who wants to remain anonymous provided this information.  There are five principle founders of Allegheny Forensics.  Four out of these five do not have clean disciplinary records with the State of Pennsylvania Licensing Board.  The fifth has a complaint pending.

Apparently the former leader of this group, Mark King, had ethical charges filed against him by somebody who claimed some sort of sexual misconduct against him.  King was temporarily removed from performing custody evaluations until these charges could be sorted out.  At this point, William Fischer took over as leader of the group.

Here are the names of the people involved with Allegheny Forensics, along with a link that will take you directly to the State of Pennsylvania web site where you can check on their license status, and see their history of disciplinary action:


Ronald Neeper, M.D. Click Here To See Disciplinary History of Dr. Neeper
Here are excerpts from the action against Dr. Neeper:

 

 

 


 

 

 

Patricia Pepe, Ph.D. Click Here To See Disciplinary History of Dr. Pepe
Here are excerpts from the action against Dr. Pepe:

 

Mark King, Ph.D. OUT! Click Here To See Disciplinary History of Dr. King

UPDATE!!!
Mark King Is Out! 
One Down...

It seems Mark King is no longer doing child custody evaluations for Allegheny Forensics.   Here's an excerpt from the ruling against King.  This is right from the pdf file available from the state:

 

Apparently King was reinstated at some point, and again had more ethics charges filed against him.  He was disciplined for performing a child custody evaluation without looking at all the evidence available to him. 

Others have accused Fischer of committing the same violations as King.  There are also other psychologists who refused to be part of Allegheny Forensics because they believed the method implemented by Fischer and King to perform custody evaluations was not sufficient.

Here is an except from the Pennsylvania State Licensing Board's Action Against Mark King:


Mark Edwin King, license no. PS-002518-L of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County was ordered by the Pennsylvania State Board of Psychology to complete 30 contact hours of continuing education.

This is to include 20 contact hours addressing the subject of child custody evaluations and 10 hours addressing the subject of ethical issues no later than 11/30/07.

In addition, a public reprimand was placed on Mr. King’s permanent board record. Mr. King violated the board’s regulations at 49 Pa. Code §41.61, Principle 3(e) and the American Psychological Association Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Divorce Proceedings by failing to gather, reassemble, and/or fully utilize available data, or data that had been destroyed; and failing, as a result, to perform a child custody evaluation/assessment of sufficient scope and quality. (3-20-06)

 

Nepotism Anybody?

Mark King was replaced.  By whom? 

It seems Mark King was replaced by Dr. Eric Bernstein, who just happens to be Dr. William Fischer's step-son.  In case you didn't realize this, Dr. Fischer is the guy running Allegheny Forensics, and he just happens to pick his step-son to do custody evaluations. 

Is Dr. Bernstein qualified?  From what I understand, he's only 29-years old and freshly licensed.  Wouldn't it turn out to be an amazing coincidence that the "best" person that Allegheny Forensics could find for the job just happens to be related to one of the founders of Allegheny Forensics?


visit PittsburghDivorce.org

 

Neil Rosenblum, Ph.D. Click Here To See Disciplinary History of Dr. Rosenblum
Here are excerpts from the action against Dr. Rosenblum:


 

CASE I

 

CASE II

 

CASE III


CASE IV


CASE V

RESULT

 

(A Side Note... Apparently it was MARK KING who was
appointed to be the supervisor for Dr. Rosenblum!)

 

 

 

visit PittsburghDivorce.org

 


Monopoly and Conflicts
of Interest Lead to
Unfair, Unjust, and
Unchallenged Evaluations


Allegheny Forensics, and their evaluators who already have been disciplined by the State Licensing Board, have monopoly powers on custody evaluations in Allegheny County.  Along with these powers comes a justified fear that they will abuse those powers.

Even if an evaluator from Allegheny Forensics fails to discharge their duties properly, no lawyer in Allegheny County is going to feel comfortable burying the inept evaluator under cross-examination.  Why?  Because this same lawyer may require this same evaluator to testify on their client's behalf in another case. 

In other words, the custody lawyers in Pittsburgh simply cannot aggressively confront bad evaluations because they may need the psychologist to be on their side in the next case.  If they get on the bad side of an evaluator, they would lose their custody practice because nobody would dare want the "black-listed" lawyer representing them.

So if you believe your lawyer hasn't confronted an evaluator strongly enough on a bad or unethical evaluation, it's not your lawyer's fault.  In fact, the lawyers also know that some judges blatantly try to protect Allegheny Forensics from and scrutiny or ridicule, so the lawyers may actually be doing you a favor by not coming down too hard on an inept evaluator.  

What often happens is that rather than embarrass an incompetent evaluator in court, and by extension the judges who hand-picked these evaluators, the lawyers may get together behind close doors with a judge and work out some settlement to the case.



The Less Time They Spend On a Case,
The More Money They Make


Let's go back to the issue of money.  

Because of the sheer volume of cases, and because the evaluators know they are fairly safe from serious ridicule or questioning from any lawyer, the evaluators cut corners and do as many cases in as short amount of time as possible. 

Let's say the evaluators get paid $5000 up front before they begin an evaluation.  They make more money based on doing more cases.  Therefore, they have incentive to do as many cases in as little time as possible.  And without being held accountable by the lawyers, they have no incentive to do a thorough job.

This is exactly what Mark King has already been reprimanded for.

'Don't call me unless you have a $3,000 or a $5,000 case.'

Here's What Cynthia Stoltz, the family court administrator in charge of the custody process, has to say about the custody evaluators:

"Besides the emotional strain and head-butting, working on custody cases can lead to higher malpractice premiums, she said. "We have had evaluators tell us, 'Don't call me unless you have a $3,000 or a $5,000 case.'

-PittsburghLive.com                                                                             visit PittsburghDivorce.org

And many lawyers, who don't dare talk publicly about this, have been involved with many similar cases.  What happens is that parents become so fearful of losing custody of their children, it becomes easy for the lawyers to talk them into settling the custody cases at some middle ground. The lawyers are doing the best they can to represent their clients in light of the system that they're forced to deal with.

In the end, the lawyers get to make their money, the custody evaluators make their money, and the judges often don't have to deal with making difficult custody decisions.  It works out well for everybody except good parents and innocent children who have been victimized by this system.



Dr. Frankenstein Won't Kill
The Monster He Created


Because Allegheny Forensics is the idea of a handful of Allegheny County family court judges, the judges are also reluctant to hold the evaluators accountable for poorly performed evaluations.  In other words, it would only make the judges look bad if they criticized the very people that they hand-picked to do the evaluations. 

In fact, in open court one particular judge threatened to throw a mother of a 14-year old girl out of the court room for even "suggesting that Dr. Fischer did not discharge his duties properly."  No wonder.  This judge was part of the group of judges that hand-picked Dr. Fischer to perform the evaluations.  

What's even more problematic are the reports that the evaluators are biasing their opinions to reflect the judge's initial decision in a case.  In other words, if the judge decides that one parent will have primary custody during the course of the evaluation, the evaluators may write a final report agreeing with the judge.  

With such a incestuous system in place, there is almost no way that anybody can be assured of a fair evaluation, especially with the amounts of money involved, and especially since the ethics of the evaluators have been called into question.


Success Through
Intimidation And Politics


Also, because of the monopolistic nature of the system, any psychologist who may want to earn a living performing custody evaluations in Allegheny County must kiss up to both the evaluators from Allegheny Forensics (since it's a private company), and to the judges who appointed Allegheny Forensics as the sole judge and jury to evaluate custody cases. 

In other words, other psychologists who may want to be involved in doing evaluations wouldn't dare criticize the evaluators from Allegheny Forensics, or the judges who appointed these evaluators, or else they would risk be left out of the political loop.

What this means is that not only does Allegheny Forensics have a contractual monopoly with the family court of Allegheny County, they also have a "strong-arm" monopoly that causes other professionals to either subjugate themselves to the powers that be, or to not be involved in any custody evaluations.

 

What You Can Do To Get Help
And Make a Difference!


Allegheny Forensics Association is a well-kept secret that very few people in Allegheny County are aware of... for now.  The time is fast approaching where this arrangement, and the damage they have done, is going to be exposed.

At some point Allegheny Forensics is going to be like a house of cards and will collapse on itself.  That point will come when there are enough people who have been victimized by their incompetence, and who are willing to stand up and be heard.  

STEP 1:  IMPORTANT!

Email a link to this website to your lawyer right away.  Your lawyer might not know the background of the people at Allegheny Forensics.  Your lawyer can use this information to impeach their credibility in court.

Here is the link to give your lawyer:  http://www.alleghenyforensics.com

STEP 2:   Click on this link PittsburghDivorce.org.